Explaining the Business of Entertainment
Before we begin, I just wanted to say, thank you. We just had one of our best weeks ever, and I couldn’t keep doing this work without your support. In case you missed it, we published three articles on the “Dogs Not Barking” of 2022 so far, my term for flops, misses and bombs in the Streaming Ratings era. Read the definition of the term here, then check out the
[Hey, you may be thinking, this isn’t a Streaming Ratings Report! True. I spent almost all of this week (and some of last week) updating my “U.S. Subscriber Estimates for Q1 of 2021.” Given that I just published a sneak peek at the Ankler yesterday, I wanted to put up this explainer for paid subs. It’s over 3,000 words with 11 extra charts no one else will see. Meanwhile we
[Folks, right off the bat, I need to let you know that we don’t have the full Nielsen data set for the week of 23-May. But not to fear, between TV Time, some early tidbits that Nielsen released on Twitter about Obi-Wan Kenobi and Stranger Things, Netflix global ratings, Samba TV, and IMDb scores, we still have a lot to cover. On Friday, if Nielsen has published a double update,
(Except on rare occasions, we only like to send out two newsletters a week to keep from spamming your inbox. But this is a rare occasion, since the EntStrategyGuy is putting up a paywall on Friday, 17-June-2022. Subscribe here! This article lays out my data philosophy , so we felt that it was important to send out to everyone. I’ve also written a series of articles debunking myths about streaming ratings,
One of the pieces of advice Substack gives you when you start trying to “monetize” is to keep putting out lots of good content for free subscribers. They recommend this because most people’s gut—including my own!—is to do the opposite, hoarding your good stuff behind your paywall like Smaug hoarding gold in the Lonely Mountain. While I won’t put out quite as much free content as Substack recommends, this advice
[Editor’s Note: As you may have read, I’m putting up a paywall on 16-Jun-2022. For the next month, you can expect a few reminders from me about this. I’m trying to balance the thin line between being obnoxious and also making a living writing about entertainment strategy. If you haven’t signed up yet, I strongly recommend getting in now for the special “Founder’s Price” of $120 per year forever. I
We’ve got a lot of interesting/important news stories to get to, but before we get to that, I want to give everyone a head’s up that I have a big, big, big announcement coming from me later this week. So stay tuned. Before the stories, a celebration. EntertainmentStrategyGuy Turns Four! This website (and associated newsletter, social feeds and what not) is officially four years old, having launched on 8-May-2018. As
Well, last week we had pretty big news: the Warner Bros (formerly Warner Media) and Discovery merger officially closed. I had covered this topic in-depth when the deal cleared the final regulatory hurdles in February, if you want my thoughts. But what about the political machinations of last week, like the departure of some key Warner Bros execs? (Jason Kilar and Ann Sarnoff in particular…) That MUST be the story
Normally, I’d tell you that awards shows don’t matter. The Emmys? The Grammys? The Golden Globe? (May they rest in peace…?) When it comes to business strategy, they don’t really matter Frankly, it’s fun to find out who wins or loses awards, but rarely impacts actual business strategy. But if you’re writing a business strategy column, you’d be hard pressed to find any other stories to write about! So for
After what felt like a few slow weeks—or months—without huge news, this week had some pretty big developments. MGM and Amazon is happening! Netflix is testing their strongest response to password sharing yet! Disney got Indian Premiere League rights! With all that news, my “most important story of the week” feature will return next week. But for now, it’s time for some streaming ratings. There was a bit of a